HomeClinics HomeAbout ClinicsAll ClinicsHot TopicsAdvancesSpecial OffersCME
Logo
Search for

Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 263-269 (July 2005)


View previous. 5 of 19 View next.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Nonfusion Technology in Spine Surgery

Russel C. Huang, MDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Federico P. Girardi, MDab, Moe R. Lim, MDc, Frank P. Cammisa Jr, MDab

Nonfusion technology in spine surgery may improve outcomes by reducing surgical morbidity and the incidence of adjacent level degeneration; however, new technologies also introduce new short- and long-term complications. There is currently no evidence that nonfusion implants are superior to fusion in mid- to long-term follow-up. Understanding the potential risks and benefits of nonfusion technology is essential for spine surgeons and their patients. This article reviews the current evidence relating to the potential risks and benefits of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.

a Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA

b Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA

c Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021

 Federico P. Girardi and Frank P. Cammisa owned stock in and Frank P. Cammisa served as a consultant to Spine Solutions, manufacturer of the ProDisc (Synthes, Paoli, PA) total disc replacement system.

PII: S0030-5898(05)00014-3

doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.006


View previous. 5 of 19 View next.