Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 53, ISSUE 4, P523-534, October 2022

A Pathway for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Published:September 13, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2022.05.006

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Orthopedic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chad D.A.
        Lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Neurol Clin. 2007; 25: 407-418
        • Kalichman L.
        • Cole R.
        • Kim D.H.
        • et al.
        Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study.
        Spine J. 2009; 9: 545-550
        • Lurie J.
        • Tomkins-Lane C.
        Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
        BMJ. 2016; : h6234
        • Buser Z.
        • Ortega B.
        • D’Oro A.
        • et al.
        Spine degenerative conditions and their treatments: national trends in the United States of America.
        Glob Spine J. 2017; 8: 57-67
        • Ishimoto Y.
        • Yoshimura N.
        • Muraki S.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20: 1103-1108
        • Deyo R.A.
        Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.
        JAMA. 2010; 303: 1259
        • Yong-Hing K.
        • Kirkaldy-Willis W.H.
        The Pathophysiology of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1983; 14: 491-504
        • Verbiest H.
        Pathomorphologic aspects of developmental lumbar stenosis.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1975; 6: 177-196
        • Genevay S.
        • Atlas S.J.
        Lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24: 253-265
        • Nadeau M.
        • Rosas-Arellano M.P.
        • Gurr K.R.
        • et al.
        The reliability of differentiating neurogenic claudication from vascular claudication based on symptomatic presentation.
        Can J Surg. 2013; 56: 372-377
        • Lønne G.
        • Ødegård B.
        • Johnsen L.G.
        • et al.
        MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?.
        Eur Spine J. 2014; 23: 1320-1324
        • Schizas C.
        • Theumann N.
        • Burn A.
        • et al.
        Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.
        Spine. 2010; 35: 1919-1924
        • Machado G.C.
        • Maher C.G.
        • Ferreira P.H.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials.
        BMJ. 2015; 350: h1225
        • Gutthann S.P.
        • GarcíaRodríguez L.A.
        • Raiford D.S.
        Individual nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and other risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation.
        Epidemiology. 1997; 8: 18-24
        • Griffin M.R.
        • Yared A.
        • Ray W.A.
        Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and acute renal failure in elderly persons.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 488-496
        • Schofferman J.
        • Mazanec D.
        Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with opioid analgesics.
        Spine J. 2008; 8: 185-194
        • Yaksi A.
        • Özgönenel L.
        • Özgönenel B.
        The efficiency of gabapentin therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Spine. 2007; 32: 939-942
        • Whitman J.M.
        • Flynn T.W.
        • Childs J.D.
        • et al.
        A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Spine. 2006; 31: 2541-2549
        • Macedo L.G.
        • Hum A.
        • Kuleba L.
        • et al.
        Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.
        Phys Ther. 2013; 93: 1646-1660
        • Prateepavanich P.
        • Thanapipatsiri S.
        • Santisatisakul P.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of lumbosacral corset in symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
        J Med Assoc Thai. 2001; 84: 572-576
      1. A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections for spinal stenosis.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 390
        • Botwin K.P.
        • Gruber R.D.
        • Bouchlas C.G.
        • et al.
        Fluoroscopically guided lumbar transformational epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar stenosis.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 81: 898-905
        • Deen Jr., H.G.
        • Zimmerman R.S.
        • Lyons M.K.
        • et al.
        Analysis of early failures after lumbar decompressive laminectomy for spinal stenosis.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 1995; 70: 33-36
        • Atlas S.J.
        • Keller R.B.
        • Wu Y.A.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.
        Spine. 2005; 30: 936-943
      2. Overdevest GM, Jacobs W, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, et al. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(3):CD010036. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010036.pub2. PMID: 25760812.

        • Su B.W.
        • Rihn J.
        • Byers R.
        • et al.
        Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
        in: Bono C.N. Fischgrund J.S. Rothman simeone the spine. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA2011: 1083-1100
        • Weinstein J.N.
        • Tosteson T.D.
        • Lurie J.D.
        • et al.
        Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 794-810
        • Weinstein J.N.
        • Tosteson T.D.
        • Lurie J.D.
        • et al.
        Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial.
        Spine. 2010; 35: 1329-1338
        • Lurie J.D.
        • Tosteson T.D.
        • Tosteson A.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Spine. 2015; 40: 63-76
        • Atlas S.J.
        • Deyo R.A.
        • Keller R.B.
        • et al.
        The maine lumbar spine study, part III.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 1787-1794
        • Malmivaara A.
        • Slätis P.
        • Heliövaara M.
        • et al.
        Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis?.
        Spine. 2007; 32: 1-8
        • Bresnahan L.
        • Ogden A.T.
        • Natarajan R.N.
        • et al.
        A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis.
        Spine. 2009; 34: 17-23
        • Gurelik M.
        • Bozkina C.
        • Kars Z.
        Unilateral laminotomy for decompression of lumbar stenosis is effective and safe: a prospective randomized comparative study.
        J Neurol Sci. 2012; 29: 744-753
        • Thomé C.
        • Zevgaridis D.
        • Leheta O.
        • et al.
        Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 3: 129-141
        • Çelik S.E.
        • Çelik S.
        • Göksu K.
        • et al.
        Microdecompressive laminatomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.
        J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 23: 229-235
        • Yagi M.
        • Okada E.
        • Ninomiya K.
        • et al.
        Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2009; 10: 293-299
        • Mobbs R.J.
        • Li J.
        • Sivabalan P.
        • et al.
        Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21: 179-186
        • Sato J.
        • Ohtori S.
        • Orita S.
        • et al.
        Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis.
        Eur Spine J. 2015; 26: 671-678
        • Oliveira L.
        • Marchi L.
        • Coutinho E.
        • et al.
        A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements.
        Spine. 2010; 35: S331-S337
        • Wang J.C.
        • Bohlman H.H.
        • Riew K.D.
        Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine. management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients∗.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1998; 80: 1728-1732
        • Stolke D.
        • Sollmann W.-P.
        • Seifert V.
        Intra- and postoperative complications in lumbar disc surgery.
        Spine. 1989; 14: 56-59
        • Ragab A.A.
        • Fye M.A.
        • Bohlman H.H.
        Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older.
        Spine. 2003; 28: 348-353
        • Rihn J.A.
        • Hilibrand A.S.
        • Zhao W.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 177-185