Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 53, ISSUE 4, P509-521, October 2022

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Evaluation and Management
Published:September 13, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2022.05.007

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Orthopedic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kalsi-Ryan S.
        • Karadimas S.K.
        • Fehlings M.G.
        Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder.
        Neuroscientist. 2013; 19: 409-421
        • Moore A.P.
        • Blumhardt L.D.
        A prospective survey of the causes of non-traumatic spastic paraparesis and tetraparesis in 585 patients.
        Spinal Cord. 1997; 35: 361-367
        • Northover J.
        • Wild J.
        • Braybrooke J.
        • et al.
        The epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41: 1543-1546
        • Karadimas S.K.
        • Erwin W.M.
        • Ely C.G.
        • et al.
        Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        Spine. 2013; 38: S21-S36
        • Matz P.G.
        • Anderson P.A.
        • Holly L.T.
        • et al.
        The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2009; 11: 104-111
        • Matsumoto M.
        • Fujimura Y.
        • Suzuki N.
        • et al.
        MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 19-24
        • Guille J.T.
        • Miller A.
        • Bowen J.R.
        • et al.
        The natural history of Klippel-Feil syndrome: clinical, roentgenographic, and magnetic resonance imaging findings at adulthood.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 1995; 15: 617-626
        • Bajwa N.S.
        • Toy J.O.
        • Young E.Y.
        • et al.
        Establishment of parameters for congenital stenosis of the cervical spine: an anatomic descriptive analysis of 1,066 cadaveric specimens.
        Eur Spine J. 2012; 21: 2467-2474
        • Breig A.
        • Turnbull I.
        • Hassler O.
        Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis: A study on fresh cadaver material.
        J Neurosurg. 1966; 25: 45-56
        • Ito T.
        • Oyanagi K.
        • Takahashi H.
        • et al.
        Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21: 827-833
        • Tracy J.A.
        • Bartleson J.D.
        Cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        Neurologist. 2010; 16: 176-187
        • Bohlman H.H.
        Cervical Spondylosis with Moderate to Severe Myelopathy.
        Spine. 1977; 2: 151-162
        • Ono K.
        • Ebara S.
        • Fuji T.
        • et al.
        Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987; 69: 215-219
        • Hosono N.
        • Sakaura H.
        • Mukai Y.
        • et al.
        A simple performance test for quantifying the severity of cervical myelopathy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90-B: 1210-1213
        • Hassanzadeh H.
        • Bell J.
        • Dooley E.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of gait and functional stability in preoperative cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients.
        Spine. 2022; 47: 317-323
        • Hilton B.
        • Tempest-Mitchell J.
        • Davies B.
        • et al.
        Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0207709
        • Nemani V.M.
        • Kim H.J.
        • Piyaskulkaew C.
        • et al.
        Correlation of cord signal change with physical examination findings in patients with cervical myelopathy.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40: 6-10
        • Tejus M.N.
        • Singh V.
        • Ramesh A.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of the finger flexion, Hoffman's and plantar reflexes as markers of cervical spinal cord compression - A comparative clinical study.
        Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015; 134: 12-16
        • Pavlov H.
        • Torg J.S.
        • Robie B.
        • et al.
        Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method.
        Radiology. 1987; 164: 771-775
        • Blackley H.R.
        • Plank L.D.
        • Robertson P.A.
        Determining the sagittal dimensions of the canal of the cervical spine: the reliability of ratios of anatomical measurements.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81: 110-112
        • Iclal E.T.
        • Lomasney L.M.
        • Jones N.S.
        • et al.
        A practical radiographic visual estimation technique for the prediction of developmental narrowing of cervical spinal canal.
        Br J Radiol. 2017; 90: 20170286
        • Boden S.D.
        • McCowin P.R.
        • Davis D.O.
        • et al.
        Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: A prospective investigation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72: 1178-1184
        • Fernández de Rota J.J.
        • Meschian S.
        • Fernández de Rota A.
        • et al.
        Cervical spondylotic myelopathy due to chronic compression: the role of signal intensity changes in magnetic resonance images.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 6: 17-22
        • Mastronardi L.
        • Elsawaf A.
        • Roperto R.
        • et al.
        Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 7: 615-622
        • Tetreault L.
        • Kopjar B.
        • Nouri A.
        • et al.
        The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.
        Eur Spine J. 2017; 26: 78-84
        • Yoshimatsu H.
        • Nagata K.
        • Goto H.
        • et al.
        Conservative treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. prediction of treatment effects by multivariate analysis.
        Spine J. 2001; 1: 269-273
        • Lee T.T.
        • Manzano G.R.
        • Green B.A.
        Modified open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy: operative technique, outcome, and predictors for gait improvement.
        J Neurosurg. 1997; 86: 64-68
        • Fehlings M.G.
        • Tetreault L.A.
        • Riew K.D.
        • et al.
        A clinical practice guideline for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy: introduction, rationale, and scope.
        Glob Spine J. 2017; 7: 21S-27S
        • Rhee J.M.
        • Shamji M.F.
        • Erwin W.M.
        • et al.
        Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy.
        Spine. 2013; 38: S55-S67
        • Bednarik J.
        • Kadanka Z.
        • Vohanka S.
        • et al.
        Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical myelopathy: an updated predictive model.
        Eur Spine J. 2008; 17: 421-431
        • Kawaguchi Y.
        • Kanamori M.
        • Ishihara H.
        • et al.
        Pathomechanism of myelopathy and surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly patients with cervical spondylosis.
        Spine. 2003; 28: 2209
        • Dalbayrak S.
        • Yaman O.
        • Firidin M.N.
        • et al.
        The contribution of cervical dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        Turk Neurosurg. 2015; 25: 36-42
        • Lall R.R.
        • Lall R.R.
        • Hauptman J.S.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2012; 33: E10
        • Lawrence B.D.
        • Jacobs W.B.
        • Norvell D.C.
        • et al.
        Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy a systematic review.
        Spine. 2013; 38: S173-S182
        • Fehlings M.G.
        • Wilson J.R.
        • Kopjar B.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the aospine north america prospective multi-center study.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2013; 95: 1651-1658
        • Kalb S.
        • Reis M.T.
        • Cowperthwaite M.C.
        • et al.
        Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: incidence and risk factors.
        World Neurosurg. 2012; 77: 183-187
        • Bazaz R.
        • Lee M.J.
        • Yoo J.U.
        MD incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery.
        Spine. 2002; 27: 2453-2458
        • Cui S.
        • Daffner S.D.
        • France J.C.
        • et al.
        The effects of perioperative corticosteroids on dysphagia following surgical procedures involving the anterior cervical spine: a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2019; 101: 2007-2014
        • ONeill K.R.
        • Neuman B.J.
        • Peters C.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for dural tears in the cervical spine.
        Spine. 2014; 39: E1015-E1020
        • Taniyama T.
        • Hirai T.
        • Yoshii T.
        • et al.
        Modified k-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcome in patients with nonlordotic alignment after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
        Spine. 2014; 39: E1261-E1268
        • Shamji M.F.
        • Massicotte E.M.
        • Traynelis V.C.
        • et al.
        Comparison of anterior surgical options for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: S195-S209
        • Kawaguchi Y.
        • Nakano M.
        • Yasuda T.
        • et al.
        More than 20 years follow-up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41: 1570-1579
        • Yoon S.T.
        • Hashimoto R.E.
        • Raich A.
        • et al.
        Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: A systematic review.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: S183-S194
        • Phan K.
        • Scherman D.B.
        • Xu J.
        • et al.
        Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multi-level cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur Spine J. 2017; 26: 94-103
        • Zhu B.
        • Xu Y.
        • Liu X.
        • et al.
        Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta- analysis.
        Eur Spine J. 2013; 22: 1583-1593
        • Hartig D.
        • Dea N.
        • Kelly A.
        • et al.
        Adverse events in surgically treated cervical spondylopathic myelopathy: a prospective validatedobservational study.
        Spine. 2015; 40: 292-298
        • Park M.S.
        • Kim T.-H.
        • Ju Y.-S.
        • et al.
        Reoperation rates after surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease according to different surgical procedures: National population-based cohort study.
        Spine. 2016; 41: 1484-1492
        • Van Eck C.F.
        • Regan C.
        • Donaldson W.F.
        • et al.
        The revision rate and occurrence of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a study of 672 consecutive patients.
        Spine. 2014; 39: 2143-2147
        • Eubanks J.D.
        • Thorpe S.W.
        • Cheruvu V.K.
        • et al.
        Does smoking influence fusion rates in posterior cervical arthrodesis with lateral mass instrumentation?.
        Clin Orthopaedics Relat Research. 2011; 469: 696-701
        • Villavicencio A.T.
        • Ashton A.
        • Busch E.
        • et al.
        Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment.
        Neurosurgery. 2011; 68: 1309-1316
        • Lee C.-H.
        • Jahng T.-A.
        • Hyun S.-J.
        • et al.
        Expansive laminoplasty versus laminectomy alone versus laminectomy and fusion for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
        J Spinal Disord Tech. 2016; 29: E9-E15
        • Sakaura H.
        • Hosono N.
        • Mukai Y.
        • et al.
        C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature.
        Spine. 2003; 28: 2447-2451
        • Pahys J.M.
        • Pahys J.R.
        • Cho S.K.
        • et al.
        Methods to decrease postoperative infections following posterior cervical spine surgery.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2013; 95-A: 549-554
        • Tetreault L.
        • Kopjar B.
        • Côté P.
        • et al.
        A clinical prediction rule for functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2015; 97: 2038-2046
        • Boehm B.A.
        • Njoku I.
        • Furey C.G.
        Single-site retrospective assessment of surgical outcomes in non-ambulatory patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022; 47: 331-336
        • Kopjar B.
        • Bohm P.E.
        • Arnold J.H.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of Surgical decompression in patients with very severe degenerative cervical myelopathy.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43: 1102-1109
        • Khan I.
        • Archer K.R.
        • Wanner J.P.
        • et al.
        Trajectory of improvement in myelopathic symptoms from 3 to 12 months following surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.
        Neurosurgery. 2020; 86: 763-768