Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 54, ISSUE 1, P109-119, January 2023

Management of Periprosthetic Bone Cysts After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Published:October 23, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2022.08.003

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Orthopedic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Glazebrook M.
        • Daniels T.
        • Younger A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 499-505
        • Cracchiolo 3rd, A.
        • Deorio J.K.
        Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 530-540
        • Henne T.D.
        • Anderson J.G.
        Total ankle arthroplasty: a historical perspective.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2002; 7: 695-702
        • Sanders A.E.
        • Kraszewski A.P.
        • Ellis S.J.
        • et al.
        Differences in gait and stair ascent after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 347-355
        • Singer S.
        • Klejman S.
        • Pinsker E.
        • et al.
        Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95 (191-110): e191
        • Thomas R.
        • Daniels T.R.
        • Parker K.
        Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 526-535
        • Coester L.M.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Leupold J.
        • et al.
        Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 219-228
        • Fuchs S.
        • Sandmann C.
        • Skwara A.
        • et al.
        Quality of life 20 years after arthrodesis of the ankle. A study of adjacent joints.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85: 994-998
        • Hendrickx R.P.
        • Stufkens S.A.
        • de Bruijn E.E.
        • et al.
        Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: 940-947
        • Haddad S.L.
        • Coetzee J.C.
        • Estok R.
        • et al.
        Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 1899-1905
        • Kim H.J.
        • Suh D.H.
        • Yang J.H.
        • et al.
        Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
        Int Orthop. 2017; 41: 101-109
        • Stavrakis A.I.
        • SooHoo N.F.
        Trends in Complication Rates Following Ankle Arthrodesis and Total Ankle Replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98: 1453-1458
        • Pugely A.J.
        • Lu X.
        • Amendola A.
        • et al.
        Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States Medicare population.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 207-215
        • Vakhshori V.
        • Sabour A.F.
        • Alluri R.K.
        • et al.
        Patient and practice trends in total ankle replacement and tibiotalar arthrodesis in the united states from 2007 to 2013.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; 27: e77-e84
        • Hauer G.
        • Hofer R.
        • Kessler M.
        • et al.
        Revision rates after total ankle replacement: a comparison of clinical studies and arthroplasty registers.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2022; 43: 176-185
        • Lintz F.
        • Mast J.
        • Bernasconi A.
        • et al.
        3D, Weightbearing topographical study of periprosthetic cysts and alignment in total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41: 1-9
        • Mehta N.
        • Serino J.
        • Hur E.S.
        • et al.
        Pathogenesis, evaluation, and management of osteolysis following total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 230-242
        • Besse J.L.
        Osteolytic cysts with total ankle replacement: frequency and causes?.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 21: 75-76
        • Espinosa N.
        • Klammer G.
        • Wirth S.H.
        Osteolysis in total ankle replacement: how does it work?.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2017; 22: 267-275
        • Schipper O.N.
        • Haddad S.L.
        • Fullam S.
        • et al.
        Wear characteristics of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene versus highly cross-linked polyethylene in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 39: 1335-1344
        • Bischoff J.E.
        • Fryman J.C.
        • Parcell J.
        • et al.
        Influence of crosslinking on the wear performance of polyethylene within total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 369-376
        • Assal M.
        • Kutaish H.
        • Acker A.
        • et al.
        Three-year rates of reoperation and revision following mobile versus fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty: a cohort of 302 patients with 2 implants of similar design.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021; 103: 2080-2088
        • Gaudot F.
        • Colombier J.A.
        • Bonnin M.
        • et al.
        A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 131-140
        • Nunley J.A.
        • Adams S.B.
        • Easley M.E.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized trial comparing mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40: 1239-1248
        • Arcangelo J.
        • Guerra-Pinto F.
        • Pinto A.
        • et al.
        Peri-prosthetic bone cysts after total ankle replacement. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 25: 96-105
        • Schipper O.N.
        • Haddad S.L.
        • Pytel P.
        • et al.
        Histological analysis of early osteolysis in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38: 351-359
        • Gross C.E.
        • Huh J.
        • Green C.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of bone grafting of bone cysts after total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 157-164
        • van Wijngaarden R.
        • van der Plaat L.
        • Nieuwe Weme R.A.
        • et al.
        Etiopathogenesis of osteolytic cysts associated with total ankle arthroplasty, a histological study.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 21: 132-136
        • Naude J.J.
        • Saragas N.P.
        • Ferrao P.N.F.
        CT scan assessment and functional outcome of periprosthetic bone grafting after total ankle arthroplasty at medium-term follow-up.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2022; 43: 609-619
        • Singh G.
        • Reichard T.
        • Hameister R.
        • et al.
        Ballooning osteolysis in 71 failed total ankle arthroplasties.
        Acta Orthop. 2016; 87: 401-405
        • Sundfeldt M.
        • Carlsson L.V.
        • Johansson C.B.
        • et al.
        Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories.
        Acta Orthop. 2006; 77: 177-197
        • Mondal S.
        • Ghosh R.
        Effects of implant orientation and implant material on tibia bone strain, implant-bone micromotion, contact pressure, and wear depth due to total ankle replacement.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019; 233: 318-331
        • Espinosa N.
        • Walti M.
        • Favre P.
        • et al.
        Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 1179-1187
        • Fukuda T.
        • Haddad S.L.
        • Ren Y.
        • et al.
        Impact of talar component rotation on contact pressure after total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31: 404-411
        • Escudero M.I.
        • Symes M.
        • Bemenderfer T.B.
        • et al.
        Does patient-specific instrumentation have a higher rate of early osteolysis than standard referencing techniques in total ankle arthroplasty? A radiographic analysis.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2020; 13: 32-42
        • Escudero M.I.
        • Le V.
        • Bemenderfer T.B.
        • et al.
        Total ankle arthroplasty radiographic alignment comparison between patient-specific instrumentation and standard instrumentation.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 851-858
        • Heisler L.
        • Vach W.
        • Katz G.
        • et al.
        Patient-Specific Instrumentation vs standard referencing in total ankle arthroplasty: a comparison of the radiologic outcome.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2022; 43: 741-749
        • Lee G.W.
        • Seo H.Y.
        • Jung D.M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of preoperative bone density in patients with and without periprosthetic osteolysis following total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 575-581
        • Cho N.H.
        • Kim S.
        • Kwon D.J.
        • et al.
        The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 494-498
        • Waizy H.
        • Behrens B.A.
        • Radtke K.
        • et al.
        Bone cyst formation after ankle arthroplasty may be caused by stress shielding. A numerical simulation of the strain adaptive bone remodelling.
        Foot (Edinb). 2017; 33: 14-19
        • Kormi S.
        • Kohonen I.
        • Koivu H.
        • et al.
        Low rate of peri-implant osteolysis in trabecular metal total ankle replacement on short- to midterm follow-up.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 1431-1438
        • Aspenberg P.
        • van der Vis H.
        Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis. Particles are not the only thing.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1998; 69: 1-4
        • Bonnin M.
        • Gaudot F.
        • Laurent J.R.
        • et al.
        The Salto total ankle arthroplasty: survivorship and analysis of failures at 7 to 11 years.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 225-236
        • Henry J.K.
        • Rider C.
        • Cody E.
        • et al.
        Evaluating and managing the painful total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 1347-1361
        • Hsu A.R.
        • Haddad S.L.
        • Myerson M.S.
        Evaluation and management of the painful total ankle arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23: 272-282
        • Besse J.L.
        • Brito N.
        • Lienhart C.
        Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 964-975
        • Viste A.
        • Al Zahrani N.
        • Brito N.
        • et al.
        Periprosthetic osteolysis after AES total ankle replacement: Conventional radiography versus CT-scan.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 21: 164-170
        • Kohonen I.
        • Koivu H.
        • Pudas T.
        • et al.
        Does computed tomography add information on radiographic analysis in detecting periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty?.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34: 180-188
        • de Cesar Netto C.
        • Fonseca L.F.
        • Fritz B.
        • et al.
        Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.
        Eur Radiol. 2018; 28: 2216-2227
        • Serino J.
        • Kunze K.N.
        • Jacobsen S.K.
        • et al.
        Nuclear medicine for the orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41: 612-623
        • Yoon H.S.
        • Lee J.
        • Choi W.J.
        • et al.
        Periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 14-21
        • Kohonen I.
        • Koivu H.
        • Tiusanen H.
        • et al.
        Are periprosthetic osteolytic lesions in ankle worth bone grafting?.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 23: 128-133
        • Yang H.Y.
        • Wang S.H.
        • Lee K.B.
        The HINTEGRA total ankle arthroplasty: functional outcomes and implant survivorship in 210 osteoarthritic ankles at a mean of 6.4 years.
        Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B: 695-701
        • Besse J.L.
        • Lienhart C.
        • Fessy M.H.
        Outcomes following cyst curettage and bone grafting for the management of periprosthetic cystic evolution after AES total ankle replacement.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013; 30: 157-170
        • Lundeen G.A.
        • Barousse P.S.
        • Moles L.H.
        • et al.
        Technique tip: endoscopic-assisted curettage and bone grafting of periprosthetic total ankle arthroplasty bone cysts.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 224-229
        • Myerson M.S.
        • Won H.Y.
        Primary and revision total ankle replacement using custom-designed prostheses.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2008; 13 (x): 521-538
        • Jonck J.H.
        • Myerson M.S.
        Revision total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2012; 17: 687-706
        • Devries J.G.
        • Berlet G.C.
        • Lee T.H.
        • et al.
        Revision total ankle replacement: an early look at agility to INBONE.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2011; 4: 235-244
        • Gaden M.T.
        • Ollivere B.J.
        Periprosthetic aseptic osteolysis in total ankle replacement: cause and management.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013; 30: 145-155
        • Horisberger M.
        • Henninger H.B.
        • Valderrabano V.
        • et al.
        Bone augmentation for revision total ankle arthroplasty with large bone defects.
        Acta Orthop. 2015; 86: 412-414
        • Li S.Y.
        • Myerson M.S.
        Management of Talar component subsidence.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2017; 22: 361-389
        • Glazebrook M.A.
        • Arsenault K.
        • Dunbar M.
        Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30: 945-949
        • Ketz J.
        • Myerson M.
        • Sanders R.
        The salvage of complex hindfoot problems with use of a custom talar total ankle prosthesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 1194-1200
        • Bejarano-Pineda L.
        • DeOrio J.K.
        • Parekh S.G.
        Combined total talus replacement and total ankle arthroplasty.
        J Surg Orthop Adv. 2020; 29: 244-248
        • Kurokawa H.
        • Taniguchi A.
        • Morita S.
        • et al.
        Total ankle arthroplasty incorporating a total talar prosthesis: a comparative study against the standard total ankle arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B: 443-446
        • Kanzaki N.
        • Chinzei N.
        • Yamamoto T.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with total talar prosthesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40: 948-954
        • Behrens S.B.
        • Irwin T.A.
        • Bemenderfer T.B.
        • et al.
        Clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total ankle arthroplasty using an intramedullary-referencing implant.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41: 1510-1518
        • Lachman J.R.
        • Ramos J.A.
        • Adams S.B.
        • et al.
        Revision surgery for metal component failure in total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019; 4 (2473011418813026)
        • Hintermann B.
        • Zwicky L.
        • Knupp M.
        • et al.
        HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1166-1174
        • Egglestone A.
        • Kakwani R.
        • Aradhyula M.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of revision surgery for failed total ankle replacement: revision arthroplasty versus arthrodesis.
        Int Orthop. 2020; 44: 2727-2734
        • Lachman J.R.
        • Ramos J.A.
        • Adams S.B.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported outcomes before and after primary and revision total ankle arthroplasty.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40: 34-41
        • Hordyk P.J.
        • Fuerbringer B.A.
        • Roukis T.S.
        Sagittal ankle and midfoot range of motion before and after revision total ankle replacement: a retrospective comparative analysis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 57: 521-526
        • Kotnis R.
        • Pasapula C.
        • Anwar F.
        • et al.
        The management of failed ankle replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 1039-1047
        • Rahm S.
        • Klammer G.
        • Benninger E.
        • et al.
        Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 349-359
        • Deleu P.A.
        • Devos Bevernage B.
        • Maldague P.
        • et al.
        Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 549-557
        • Kamrad I.
        • Henricson A.
        • Magnusson H.
        • et al.
        Outcome after salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 255-261
        • Culpan P.
        • Le Strat V.
        • Piriou P.
        • et al.
        Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89: 1178-1183
        • Berkowitz M.J.
        • Clare M.P.
        • Walling A.K.
        • et al.
        Salvage of failed total ankle arthroplasty with fusion using structural allograft and internal fixation.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: S493-S502
        • Hopgood P.
        • Kumar R.
        • Wood P.L.
        Ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 1032-1038
        • Kitaoka H.B.
        • Romness D.W.
        Arthrodesis for failed ankle arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 1992; 7: 277-284
        • Carlsson A.S.
        • Montgomery F.
        • Besjakov J.
        Arthrodesis of the ankle secondary to replacement.
        Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19: 240-245
        • Ali A.A.
        • Forrester R.A.
        • O'Connor P.
        • et al.
        Revision of failed total ankle arthroplasty to a hindfoot fusion: 23 consecutive cases using the Phoenix nail.
        Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B: 475-479
        • Gross C.
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Adams S.B.
        • et al.
        Ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement: a systematic review of the literature.
        Foot Ankle Spec. 2015; 8: 143-151
        • Adams S.B.
        Salvage Arthrodesis for Failed Total Ankle Replacement.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2020; 25: 281-291
        • Coetzee J.C.
        • Den Hartog B.D.
        • Stone McGaver R.
        • et al.
        Femoral Head Allografts for Talar Body Defects.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42: 815-823
        • Bullens P.
        • de Waal Malefijt M.
        • Louwerens J.W.
        Conversion of failed ankle arthroplasty to an arthrodesis. Technique using an arthrodesis nail and a cage filled with morsellized bone graft.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 16: 101-104
        • Steele J.R.
        • Kadakia R.J.
        • Cunningham D.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 3D printed spherical implants versus femoral head allografts for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 59: 1167-1170
        • Carlsson A.
        Unsuccessful use of a titanium mesh cage in ankle arthrodesis: a report on three cases operated on due to a failed ankle replacement.
        J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008; 47: 337-342
        • Aubret S.
        • Merlini L.
        • Fessy M.
        • et al.
        Poor outcomes of fusion with Trabecular Metal implants after failed total ankle replacement: early results in 11 patients.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104: 231-237