Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 54, ISSUE 1, P23-35, January 2023

The Use of Proximal Femur Replacement for the Management of Oncologic Lesions in the Proximal Femur

A Review
Published:October 23, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2022.08.006

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Orthopedic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kabukcuoglu Y.
        • Grimer R.J.
        • Tillman R.M.
        • et al.
        Endoprosthetic replacement for primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 358: 8-14
        • Trovarelli G.P.
        • Cappallari A.
        • Angelini A.
        • et al.
        Proximal femoral reconstructions: A European “Italian” experience. A case series.
        Curr Orthop Pract. 2019; 30: 510-515
        • Unwin P.S.
        • Cannon S.R.
        • Grimer R.J.
        • et al.
        Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78: 5-13
        • Chandrasekar C.R.
        • Grimer R.J.
        • Carter S.R.
        • et al.
        Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2008; 3: 50
        • Harvey N.
        • Ahlmann E.R.
        • Allison D.C.
        • et al.
        Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 684-691
        • Calabro T.
        • Van Rooyen R.
        • Piraino I.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016; 26: 415-421
        • Houdek M.T.
        • Watts C.D.
        • Wyles C.C.
        • et al.
        Functional and oncologic outcome of cemented endoprosthesis for malignant proximal femoral tumors.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114: 501-506
        • Sofulu O.
        • Sirin E.
        • Saglam F.
        • et al.
        Implant survival and functional results of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral metastases with pathological fractures.
        Hip Int. 2022; 32: 174-184
        • Henderson E.R.
        • Groundland J.S.
        • Pala E.
        • et al.
        Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 418-429
        • Morris H.G.
        • Capanna R.
        • Del Ben M.
        • et al.
        Prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur after resection for bone tumors.
        J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10: 293-299
        • Zehr R.J.
        • Enneking W.F.
        • Scarborough M.T.
        Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; : 207-223
        • Donati D.
        • Zavatta M.
        • Gozzi E.
        • et al.
        Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour a long-term follow-up.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83: 1156-1160
        • Ilyas I.
        • Pant R.
        • Kurar A.
        • et al.
        Modular megaprosthesis for proximal femoral tumors.
        Int Orthop. 2002; 26: 170-173
        • Ahlmann E.R.
        • Menendez L.R.
        • Kermani C.
        • et al.
        Survivorship and clinical outcome of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplastic disease of the lower limb.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 790-795
        • Farid Y.
        • Lin P.P.
        • Lewis V.O.
        • et al.
        Endoprosthetic and allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 442: 223-229
        • Menendez L.R.
        • Ahlmann E.R.
        • Kermani C.
        • et al.
        Endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplasms of the proximal femur.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 450: 46-51
        • Gosheger G.
        • Gebert C.
        • Ahrens H.
        • et al.
        Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 450: 164-171
        • Orlic D.
        • Smerdelj M.
        • Kolundzic R.
        • et al.
        Lower limb salvage surgery: modular endoprosthesis in bone tumour treatment.
        Int Orthop. 2006; 30: 458-464
        • Finstein J.L.
        • King J.J.
        • Fox E.J.
        • et al.
        Bipolar proximal femoral replacement prostheses for musculoskeletal neoplasms.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 459: 66-75
        • Selek H.
        • Basarir K.
        • Yildiz Y.
        • et al.
        Cemented endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic bone disease in the proximal femur.
        J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23: 112-117
        • Potter B.K.
        • Chow V.E.
        • Adams S.C.
        • et al.
        Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement: metastatic versus primary tumors.
        Surg Oncol. 2009; 18: 343-349
        • Pala E.
        • Henderson E.R.
        • Calabro T.
        • et al.
        Survival of current production tumor endoprostheses: complications, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis.
        J Surg Oncol. 2013; 108: 403-408
        • Johnson J.D.
        • Perry K.I.
        • Yuan B.J.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement for Salvage of Failed Fixation of Malignant Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 700-703
        • Sorensen M.S.
        • Horstmann P.F.
        • Hindso K.
        • et al.
        Use of endoprostheses for proximal femur metastases results in a rapid rehabilitation and low risk of implant failure. A prospective population-based study.
        J Bone Oncol. 2019; 19: 100264
        • Yilmaz M.
        • Sorensen M.S.
        • Saebye C.
        • et al.
        Long-term results of the Global Modular Replacement System tumor prosthesis for reconstruction after limb-sparing bone resections in orthopedic oncologic conditions: Results from a national cohort.
        J Surg Oncol. 2019; 120: 183-192
        • Bischel O.E.
        • Suda A.J.
        • Bohm P.M.
        • et al.
        En-Bloc Resection of Metastases of the Proximal Femur and Reconstruction by Modular Arthroplasty is Not Only Justified in Patients with a Curative Treatment Option-An Observational Study of a Consecutive Series of 45 Patients.
        J Clin Med. 2020; 9https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030758
        • Nooh A.
        • Alaseem A.
        • Epure L.M.
        • et al.
        Radiographic, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Cemented Modular Proximal Femur Replacement Using the "French Paradox" Technique.
        J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: 2567-2572
        • Gusho C.A.
        • Clayton B.
        • Mehta N.
        • et al.
        Internal fixation versus endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur for metastatic bone disease: Single institutional outcomes.
        J Orthop. 2021; 28: 86-90
        • Toepfer A.
        • Strasser V.
        • Ladurner A.
        • et al.
        Different outcomes after proximal femoral replacement in oncologic and failed revision arthroplasty patients - a retrospective cohort study.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 813
        • Zavras A.G.
        • Fice M.P.
        • Dandu N.
        • et al.
        Indication for Proximal Femoral Replacement Is Associated With Risk of Failure.
        J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37: 917-924
        • Zhang X.
        • Tang X.
        • Li Z.
        • et al.
        Clinical and radiological outcomes of combined modular prothesis and cortical strut for revision proximal femur in giant cell tumor of bone patients.
        J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022; 30 (10225536221095202)
        • Bernthal N.M.
        • Schwartz A.J.
        • Oakes D.A.
        • et al.
        How long do endoprosthetic reconstructions for proximal femoral tumors last?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 2867-2874
        • Pennekamp P.H.
        • Wirtz D.C.
        • Durr H.R.
        [Proximal and total femur replacement].
        Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012; 24: 215-226
        • Deptula M.
        • Zielinski J.
        • Wardowska A.
        • et al.
        Wound healing complications in oncological patients: perspectives for cellular therapy.
        Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2019; 36: 139-146
        • Haubner F.
        • Ohmann E.
        • Pohl F.
        • et al.
        Wound healing after radiation therapy: review of the literature.
        Radiat Oncol. 2012; 7: 162
        • McDonald D.J.
        • Capanna R.
        • Gherlinzoni F.
        • et al.
        Influence of chemotherapy on perioperative complications in limb salvage surgery for bone tumors.
        Cancer. 1990; 65: 1509-1516
        • Lozano Calderon S.A.
        • Kuechle J.
        • Raskin K.A.
        • et al.
        Lower Extremity Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018; 26: e249-e257
        • Schoof B.
        • Jakobs O.
        • Gehrke T.
        • et al.
        Proximal femoral reconstruction after aseptic loosening following proximal femoral replacement for Ewing sarcoma: a case report with one-year follow-up.
        Hip Int. 2014; 24: 103-107
        • Dobbs H.S.
        • Scales J.T.
        • Wilson J.N.
        • et al.
        Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur and acetabulum. A survival analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981; 63-B: 219-224
        • Healey J.H.
        CORR Insights: High infection rate outcomes in long-bone tumor surgery with endoprosthetic reconstruction in adults: a systematic review.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 2028-2029
        • Lindeque B.
        • Hartman Z.
        • Noshchenko A.
        • et al.
        Infection after primary total hip arthroplasty.
        Orthopedics. 2014; 37: 257-265
        • Streitbuerger A.
        • Henrichs M.P.
        • Hauschild G.
        • et al.
        Silver-coated megaprostheses in the proximal femur in patients with sarcoma.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019; 29: 79-85
        • Hardes J.
        • von Eiff C.
        • Streitbuerger A.
        • et al.
        Reduction of periprosthetic infection with silver-coated megaprostheses in patients with bone sarcoma.
        J Surg Oncol. 2010; 101: 389-395