Review Article| Volume 54, ISSUE 2, P161-168, April 2023

Remote Patient Monitoring Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Published:January 31, 2023DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Orthopedic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Jayakumar P.
        • Di J.
        • Fu J.
        • et al.
        A patient-focused technology-enabled program improves outcomes in primary total hip and knee replacement surgery.
        JBJS Open Access. 2017; 2: e0023
        • Papas P.V.
        • Kim S.J.
        • Ulcoq S.
        • et al.
        The utilization of an internet-based patient portal and its impact on surgical outcomes in the total joint arthroplasty patient population.
        Orthop Proc. 2018; 100-B: 62
        • Ramkumar P.N.
        • Haeberle H.S.
        • Ramanathan D.
        • et al.
        Remote patient monitoring using mobile health for total knee arthroplasty: Validation of a wearable and machine learning–based surveillance platform.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 2253-2259
      1. Kurtz S.M., Higgs G.B., Chen Z., et al., Patient perceptions of wearable and smartphone technologies for remote outcome monitoring in patients who have hip osteoarthritis or arthroplasties, J Arthroplasty, 37 (7), 2022, S488-S492.

        • Mehta S.J.
        • Hume E.
        • Troxel A.B.
        • et al.
        Effect of remote monitoring on discharge to home, return to activity, and rehospitalization after hip and knee arthroplasty.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3 (e2028328)
        • Rosner B.I.
        • Gottlieb M.
        • Anderson W.N.
        Effectiveness of an automated digital remote guidance and telemonitoring platform on costs, readmissions, and complications after hip and knee arthroplasties.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018, 988-996; 33
        • Rao S.S.
        • Loeb A.E.
        • Amin R.M.
        • et al.
        Establishing telemedicine in an academic total joint arthroplasty practice: Needs and opportunities highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
        Arthroplasty Today. 2020; 6: 617-622
        • Giunta N.M.
        • Paladugu P.S.
        • Bernstein D.N.
        • et al.
        Telemedicine hip and knee arthroplasty experience during COVID-19.
        J Arthroplasty. 37 (8), 2022; (S814-S818.)
        • Chaudhry H.
        • Nadeem S.
        • Mundi R.
        How satisfied are patients and surgeons with telemedicine in orthopaedic care during the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 2020; 479: 47-56
        • Tanaka M.J.
        • Oh L.S.
        • Martin S.D.
        • et al.
        Telemedicine in the era of COVID-19.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2020, e57 (1-7); 102
        • Campbell K.
        • Louie P.
        • Levine B.
        • et al.
        Using patient engagement platforms in the postoperative management of patients.
        Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020; 13: 479-484
        • Holte A.J.
        • Molloy I.B.
        • Werth P.M.
        • et al.
        Do patient engagement platforms in total joint arthroplasty improve patient-reported outcomes?.
        J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 3850-3858
        • Andrawis J.
        • Akhavan S.
        • Chan V.
        • et al.
        Higher preoperative patient activation associated with better patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 2015; 473: 2688-2697
        • Knapp P.W.
        • Keller R.A.
        • Mabee K.A.
        • et al.
        Quantifying patient engagement in total joint Arthroplasty using Digital Application-based technology.
        J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 3108-3117
        • Maempel J.F.
        • Clement N.D.
        • Ballantyne J.A.
        • et al.
        Enhanced recovery programmes after total hip arthroplasty can result in reduced length of hospital stay without compromising functional outcome.
        Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-b: 475
        • Bitsaki M.
        • Koutras G.
        • Heep H.
        • et al.
        Cost-effective mobile-based health care system for managing total joint arthroplasty follow-up.
        Healthc Inform Res. 2017; 23: 67
        • Koutras C.
        • Bitsaki M.
        • Koutras G.
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic impact of e-Health services in major joint replacement: a scoping review.
        Technol Health Care. 2015; 23: 809
        • Lyman S.
        • Hidaka C.
        • Fields K.
        • et al.
        Monitoring patient recovery after Tha or TKA using Mobile Technology.
        HSS J. 2020; 16: 358-365
        • Toogood P.A.
        • Abdel M.P.
        • Spear J.A.
        • et al.
        The monitoring of activity at home after total hip arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B: 1450-1454
        • Bahadori S.
        • Immins T.
        • Wainwright T.W.
        A review of wearable motion tracking systems used in rehabilitation following hip and knee replacement.
        J Rehabil Assistive Tech Eng. 2018; 5 (205566831877181)
        • Patterson J.T.
        • Wu H.-H.
        • Chung C.C.
        • et al.
        Wearable activity sensors and early pain after total joint arthroplasty.
        Arthroplasty Today. 2020; 6: 68-70
        • Goel R.
        • Danoff J.R.
        • Petrera M.
        • et al.
        A step in the right direction: Body location determines activity tracking device accuracy in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020, 77-85; 28
        • Shah R.F.
        • Zaid M.B.
        • Bendich I.
        • et al.
        Optimal sampling frequency for wearable sensor data in Arthroplasty Outcomes Research. A prospective observational cohort trial.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 2248-2252
        • Bini S.A.
        • Shah R.F.
        • Bendich I.
        • et al.
        Machine learning algorithms can use wearable sensor data to accurately predict six-week patient-reported outcome scores following joint replacement in a prospective trial.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 2242-2247
        • Jourdan T.
        • Debs N.
        • Frindel C.
        The contribution of machine learning in the validation of commercial wearable sensors for gait monitoring in patients: A systematic review.
        Sensors. 2021; 21: 4808
        • Bolam S.M.
        • Batinica B.
        • Yeung T.C.
        • et al.
        Remote patient monitoring with wearable sensors following knee arthroplasty.
        Sensors. 2021; 21: 5143
        • Bell K.M.
        • Onyeukwu C.
        • Smith C.N.
        • et al.
        A portable system for remote rehabilitation following a total knee replacement: a pilot randomized controlled clinical study.
        Sensors. 2020; 20: 6118
      2. ROMTech. Romtech and the PortableConnect help patients with advanced telemedicine technology. GlobeNewswire News Room.
        (Available at:) (Accessed July 30, 2022)
        • Bergmann J.
        • Chandaria V.
        • McGregor A.
        Wearable and implantable sensors: The patient’s perspective.
        Sensors. 2012; 12: 16695-16709
        • Cushner F.D.
        • Schiller P.J.
        • Mueller J.K.
        • et al.
        A cadaveric study addressing the feasibility of remote patient monitoring prosthesis for total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2022, S350-S354; 37
        • Silverio-Fernández M.
        • Renukappa S.
        • Suresh S.
        What is a smart device? - a conceptualisation within the paradigm of the internet of things.
        Visualization Eng. 2018, 1-10; 6
        • Ledet E.H.
        • DʼLima D.
        • Westerhoff P.
        • et al.
        Implantable sensor technology: From Research to Clinical Practice.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012; 20: 383-392
        • Halder A.
        • Kutzner I.
        • Graichen F.
        • et al.
        Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2012; 94: 1023-1029
        • Kutzner I.
        • Bender A.
        • Dymke J.
        • et al.
        Mediolateral force distribution at the knee joint shifts across activities and is driven by tibiofemoral alignment.
        Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B: 779-787
        • D'Lima D.D.
        • Patil S.
        • Steklov N.
        • et al.
        Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21: 255-262
        • Ledet E.H.
        • Liddle B.
        • Kradinova K.
        • et al.
        Smart implants in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes: A Review.
        Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Health. 2018; 5: 41-51
        • Iyengar K.P.
        • Gowers B.T.
        • Jain V.K.
        • et al.
        Smart sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty.
        J Clin Orthopaedics Trauma. 2021; 22: 101605
        • Couey C.
        4 remote patient monitoring reimbursement tips for your practice. Top Business Software Resources for Buyers - 2022 | Software Advice.
        (Available at:) (Accessed July 24, 2022)
      3. 2022 Medicare CPT code reimbursements for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM). Signallamp Health.
        (Available at:) (Accessed July 24, 2022)