Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 54, ISSUE 2, P209-225, April 2023

Download started.

Ok

Emerging Technologies in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Navigation, Mixed Reality, and Preoperative Planning
  • Brenton R. Jennewine
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

    Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, 1211 Union Avenue #500, Memphis, TN 38104, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Tyler J. Brolin
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 920 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

    Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, 1400 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN 38138, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 31, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2022.11.006

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Orthopedic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Spencer E.E.
        • Winter U.
        • et al.
        Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 111S-121S
        • Singh J.A.
        • Sperling J.
        • Buchbinder R.
        • et al.
        Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis: a Cochrane systematic review.
        J Rheumatol. 2011; 38: 598-605
        • Frankle M.
        • Siegal S.
        • Pupello D.
        • et al.
        The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1697-1705
        • Piper C.
        • Neviaser A.
        Survivorship of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022; 30: 457-465
        • Chelli M.
        • Boileau P.
        • Domos P.
        • et al.
        Survivorship of reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to indication, age and gender.
        J Clin Med. 2022; 11: 2677
        • Bohsali K.I.
        • Bois A.J.
        • Wirth M.A.
        Complications of Shoulder Arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99 (published correction appears in J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):e67): 256-269
        • Boileau P.
        Complications and revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102: S33-S43
        • Fox T.J.
        • Foruria A.M.
        • Klika B.J.
        • et al.
        Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1221-1227
      1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty annual report, AOA, Adelaide, Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020. Accessed August 2, 2022.

        • Farron A.
        • Terrier A.
        • Büchler P.
        Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15: 521-526
        • Shapiro T.A.
        • McGarry M.H.
        • Gupta R.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: S90-S95
        • Ho J.C.
        • Sabesan V.J.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: e82
        • Chebli C.
        • Huber P.
        • Watling J.
        • et al.
        Factors affecting fixation of the glenoid component of a reverse total shoulder prothesis.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 323-327
        • Nyffeler R.W.
        • Werner C.M.
        • Gerber C.
        Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 524-528
        • Karelse A.
        • Kegels L.
        • De Wilde L.
        The pillars of the scapula.
        Clin Anat. 2007; 20: 392-399
        • Nerot C.
        • Ohl X.
        Primary shoulder reverse arthroplasty: surgical technique.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100: S181-S190
        • Gutiérrez S.
        • Walker M.
        • Willis M.
        • et al.
        Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 732-739
        • Bitzer A.
        • Rojas J.
        • Patten I.S.
        • et al.
        Incidence and risk factors for aseptic baseplate loosening of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 2145-2152
        • Hart N.D.
        • Clark J.C.
        • Wade Krause F.R.
        • et al.
        Glenoid screw position in the Encore reverse shoulder prosthesis: an anatomic dissection study of screw relationship to surrounding structures.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 814-820
        • Leschinger T.
        • Hackl M.
        • Buess E.
        • et al.
        The risk of suprascapular and axillary nerve injury in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an anatomic study.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 2042-2049
        • Molony D.C.
        • Cassar Gheiti A.J.
        • Kennedy J.
        • et al.
        A cadaveric model for suprascapular nerve injury during glenoid component screw insertion in reverse-geometry shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 1323-1327
        • Crosby L.A.
        • Hamilton A.
        • Twiss T.
        Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 2544-2549
        • Otto R.J.
        • Virani N.A.
        • Levy J.C.
        • et al.
        Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1514-1521
        • Codsi M.J.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        The effect of screw position on the initial fixation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis in a glenoid with a cavitary bone defect.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 479-486
        • Roche C.
        • DiGeorgio C.
        • Yegres J.
        • et al.
        Impact of screw length and screw quantity on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty glenoid fixation for 2 different sizes of glenoid baseplates.
        JSES Open Access. 2019; 3: 296-303
        • James J.
        • Allison M.A.
        • Werner F.W.
        • et al.
        Reverse shoulder arthroplasty glenoid fixation: is there a benefit in using four instead of two screws?.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1030-1036
        • Jain N.
        • Pietrobon R.
        • Hocker S.
        • et al.
        The relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 496-505
        • Singh A.
        • Yian E.H.
        • Dillon M.T.
        • et al.
        The effect of surgeon and hospital volume on shoulder arthroplasty perioperative quality metrics.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 1187-1194
        • Papadonikolakis A.
        • Neradilek M.B.
        • Matsen 3rd, F.A.
        Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 2205-2212
        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Greeson C.
        • Downing D.
        • et al.
        Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 48-55
        • Tanzer M.
        • Makhdom A.M.
        Preoperative planning in primary total knee arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24: 220-230https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00332
        • Della Valle A.G.
        • Padgett D.E.
        • Salvati E.A.
        Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005; 13: 455-462
        • Atesok K.
        • Galos D.
        • Jazrawi L.M.
        • et al.
        Preoperative planning in orthopaedic surgery. current practice and evolving applications.
        Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015; 73: 257-268
        • Lowe J.T.
        • Testa E.J.
        • Li X.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 669-673
        • Scalise J.J.
        • Codsi M.J.
        • Bryan J.
        • et al.
        The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 487-491
        • Friedman R.J.
        • Hawthorne K.B.
        • Genez B.M.
        The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74: 1032-1037
        • Maurer A.
        • Fucentese S.F.
        • Pfirrmann C.W.
        • et al.
        Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 1096-1103
        • Scalise J.J.
        • Codsi M.J.
        • Bryan J.
        • et al.
        The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 2438-2445
        • Bryce C.D.
        • Davison A.C.
        • Lewis G.S.
        • et al.
        Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 692-699
        • Kwon Y.W.
        • Powell K.A.
        • Yum J.K.
        • et al.
        Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 85-90
        • Bokor D.J.
        • O'Sullivan M.D.
        • Hazan G.J.
        Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 595-598
        • Denard P.J.
        • Provencher M.T.
        • Lädermann A.
        • et al.
        Version and inclination obtained with 3-dimensional planning in total shoulder arthroplasty: do different programs produce the same results?.
        JSES Open Access. 2018; 2: 200-204
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Chalmers P.N.
        • Denard P.
        • et al.
        Does commercially available shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software agree with surgeon measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation?.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 30: 413-420
        • Nowak D.D.
        • Bahu M.J.
        • Gardner T.R.
        • et al.
        Simulation of surgical glenoid resurfacing using three-dimensional computed tomography of the arthritic glenohumeral joint: the amount of glenoid retroversion that can be corrected.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 680-688
        • Clavert P.
        • Millett P.J.
        • Warner J.J.
        Glenoid resurfacing: what are the limits to asymmetric reaming for posterior erosion?.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 843-848
        • Sabesan V.
        • Callanan M.
        • Ho J.
        • et al.
        Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft for osteoarthritis with severe glenoid bone loss.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1290-1296
        • Knowles N.K.
        • Ferreira L.M.
        • Athwal G.S.
        Augmented glenoid component designs for type B2 erosions: a computational comparison by volume of bone removal and quality of remaining bone.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 1218-1226
        • Rosenthal Y.
        • Rettig S.A.
        • Virk M.S.
        • et al.
        Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29: 2564-2570
        • Jacquot A.
        • Gauci M.O.
        • Chaoui J.
        • et al.
        Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Int Orthop. 2018; 42: 2897-2906
        • Throckmorton T.W.
        • Gulotta L.V.
        • Bonnarens F.O.
        • et al.
        Patient-specific targeting guides compared with traditional instrumentation for glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-surgeon study in 70 arthritic cadaver specimens.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 965-971
        • Berhouet J.
        • Gulotta L.V.
        • Dines D.M.
        • et al.
        Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103: 407-413
        • Berhouet J.
        • Jacquot A.
        • Walch G.
        • et al.
        Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022; 108: 103115
        • Lee C.S.
        • Davis S.M.
        • Lane C.J.
        • et al.
        Reliability and accuracy of digital templating for the humeral component of total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Shoulder Elbow. 2015; 7: 29-35
        • Freehill M.T.
        • Weick J.W.
        • Ponce B.A.
        • et al.
        Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: component size prediction with 3-dimensional pre-operative digital planning.
        J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2022; 6 (24715492221098818)
        • Poltaretskyi S.
        • Chaoui J.
        • Mayya M.
        • et al.
        Prediction of the pre-morbid 3D anatomy of the proximal humerus based on statistical shape modelling.
        Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B: 927-933
        • Giannotti S.
        • Sacchetti F.
        • Citarelli C.
        • et al.
        Single-use, patient-specific instrumentation technology in knee arthroplasty: a comparative study between standard instrumentation and PSI efficiency system.
        Musculoskelet Surg. 2020; 104: 195-200
        • Gomes N.S.
        Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty.
        EFORT Open Rev. 2017; 1: 177-182
        • Yam M.G.J.
        • Chao J.Y.Y.
        • Leong C.
        • et al.
        3D printed patient specific customised surgical jig for reverse shoulder arthroplasty, a cost effective and accurate solution.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 21: 101503
        • Hendel M.D.
        • Bryan J.A.
        • Barsoum W.K.
        • et al.
        Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 2167-2175
        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Weiner S.
        • Rodriguez E.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 651-658
        • Cabarcas B.C.
        • Cvetanovich G.L.
        • Gowd A.K.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        JSES Open Access. 2019; 3: 117-129
        • Villatte G.
        • Muller A.S.
        • Pereira B.
        • et al.
        Use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0201759
        • Darwood A.
        • Hurst S.A.
        • Villatte G.
        • et al.
        Novel robotic technology for the rapid intraoperative manufacture of patient-specific instrumentation allowing for improved glenoid component accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022; 31: 561-570
        • Walch G.
        • Vezeridis P.S.
        • Boileau P.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 302-309
        • Moineau G.
        • Levigne C.
        • Boileau P.
        • et al.
        • French Society for Shoulder & Elbow (SOFEC)
        Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: feasibility and reproducibility.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98: S139-S145
        • Gregory T.M.
        • Sankey A.
        • Augereau B.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on clinical and radiological outcome in a retrospective, longitudinal, monocentric open study.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e75791
        • Davis E.T.
        • Gallie P.
        • Macgroarty K.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89: 557-560
        • Lützner J.
        • Krummenauer F.
        • Wolf C.
        • et al.
        Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 1039-1044
        • Stindel E.
        • Merloz P.
        • Graf P.
        • et al.
        'expérience de la navigation chirurgicale dans l'ouest [computer assisted orthopedics surgery].
        Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007; 93: 2S11-2S32
        • Victor J.
        • Hoste D.
        Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428: 131-139
        • Lung T.S.
        • Cruickshank D.
        • Grant H.J.
        • et al.
        Factors contributing to glenoid baseplate micromotion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28: 648-653
        • Jahic D.
        • Suero E.M.
        • Marjanovic B.
        The use of computer navigation and patient specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: everyday practice, just for special cases or actually teaching a surgeon?.
        Acta Inform Med. 2021; 29: 130-133
        • Verborgt O.
        • Vanhees M.
        • Heylen S.
        • et al.
        Computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty.
        Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014; 22: e42-e49
        • Edwards T.B.
        • Gartsman G.M.
        • O'Connor D.P.
        • et al.
        Safety and utility of computer-aided shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 503-508
        • Nguyen D.
        • Ferreira L.M.
        • Brownhill J.R.
        • et al.
        Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 907-914
        • Aminov O.
        • Regan W.
        • Giles J.W.
        • et al.
        Targeting repeatability of a less obtrusive surgical navigation procedure for total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022; 17: 283-293
        • Colasanti G.B.
        • Moreschini F.
        • Cataldi C.
        • et al.
        GPS guided reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
        Acta Biomed. 2020; 91: 204-208
        • Verborgt O.
        • De Smedt T.
        • Vanhees M.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 21-26
        • Kircher J.
        • Wiedemann M.
        • Magosch P.
        • et al.
        Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 515-520
        • Wang A.W.
        • Hayes A.
        • Gibbons R.
        • et al.
        Computer navigation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical trial to evaluate the learning curve.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29: 617-623
        • Schoch B.S.
        • Haupt E.
        • Leonor T.
        • et al.
        Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29: 2257-2263
        • Sadoghi P.
        • Vavken J.
        • Leithner A.
        • et al.
        Benefit of intraoperative navigation on glenoid component positioning during total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135: 41-47
        • Burns D.M.
        • Frank T.
        • Whyne C.M.
        • et al.
        Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Shoulder Elbow. 2019; 11: 16-28
        • Moreschini F.
        • Colasanti G.B.
        • Cataldi C.
        • et al.
        Pre-operative CT-based planning integrated with intra-operative navigation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: data acquisition and analysis protocol, and preliminary results of navigated versus conventional surgery.
        Dose Response. 2020; 18 (1559325820970832)
        • Hones K.M.
        • King J.J.
        • Schoch B.S.
        • et al.
        The in vivo impact of computer navigation on screw number and length in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 30: e629-e635
        • Sprowls G.R.
        • Wilson C.D.
        • Stewart W.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative navigation and preoperative templating software are associated with increased glenoid baseplate screw length and use of augmented baseplates in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
        JSES Int. 2020; 5: 102-108
        • Suter T.
        • Kolz C.W.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        • et al.
        Humeral head osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between anterosuperior and inferoanterior resection techniques.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 343-351
        • Geervliet P.C.
        • Willems J.H.
        • Sierevelt I.N.
        • et al.
        Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14: 474
        • Cavanagh J.
        • Lockhart J.
        • Langohr G.D.G.
        • et al.
        A comparison of patient-specific instrumentation to navigation for conducting humeral head osteotomies during shoulder arthroplasty.
        JSES Int. 2021; 5: 875-880
        • Jud L.
        • Fotouhi J.
        • Andronic O.
        • et al.
        Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery - a systematic review.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21: 103
        • Berhouet J.
        • Slimane M.
        • Facomprez M.
        • et al.
        Views on a new surgical assistance method for implanting the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty. Part 2: From three-dimensional reconstruction to augmented reality: feasibility study.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 105: 211-218
        • Kriechling P.
        • Loucas R.
        • Loucas M.
        • et al.
        Augmented reality through head-mounted display for navigation of baseplate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; (published online ahead of print, 2021 Jul 2)https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04025-5
        • Kriechling P.
        • Roner S.
        • Liebmann F.
        • et al.
        Augmented reality for base plate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a feasibility study.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 141: 1447-1453
        • Schlueter-Brust K.
        • Henckel J.
        • Katinakis F.
        • et al.
        Augmented-reality-assisted K-wire placement for glenoid component positioning in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a proof-of-concept study.
        J Pers Med. 2021; 11: 777
        • Gregory T.M.
        • Gregory J.
        • Sledge J.
        • et al.
        Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept.
        Acta Orthop. 2018; 89: 480-483
        • Rojas J.T.
        • Lädermann A.
        • Ho S.W.L.
        • et al.
        Glenoid component placement assisted by augmented reality through a head-mounted display during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2022; 11: e863-e874
        • Ponce et al teaching in SA
        • Ponce B.A.
        • Menendez M.E.
        • et al.
        Emerging technology in surgical education: combining real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices.
        Orthopedics. 2014; 37: 751-757