Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Orthopedic ClinicsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- History of navigation guided spine surgery.in: 1st edition. Technical advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. vol. 1. Springer Nature, Singapore2022: 3-10
- Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.BMJ. 2015; 350: h1603
- Minimally invasive versus open laminectomy/discectomy, transforaminal lumbar, and posterior lumbar interbody fusions: a systematic review.Cureus. 2017; 9https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1488
- Complications and revision rates in minimally invasive robotic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided spinal fusions: the mis refresh prospective comparative study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 46: 1661-1668
- Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.Eur Spine J. 2013; 22: 1741-1749
- Current state of navigation in spine surgery.Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1335
- 3D Navigation-guided resection of giant ventral cervical intradural schwannoma with 360-degree stabilization.Clin Spine Surg. 2018; 31: E257-E265
- Total navigation in spine surgery; a concise guide to eliminate fluoroscopy using a portable intraoperative computed tomography 3-dimensional navigation system.World Neurosurg. 2017; 100: 325-335
- Can fan-beam interactive computed tomography accurately predict indirect decompression in minimally invasive spine surgery fusion procedures?.World Neurosurg. 2017; 107: 322-333
- Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery.Spine J. 2008; 8: 584-590
- Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion?.Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 2010; 468: 2419-2429
- Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use.J Robotic Surg. 2021; 15: 13-23
- Comparison of accuracy of pedicle screw insertion among 4 guided technologies in spine surgery.Med Sci Monitor. 2017; 23: 5960-5968
- Augmented reality-assisted spine surgery: an early experience demonstrating safety and accuracy with 218 screws.Glob Spine J. 2022; 0: 1-6
- Navigation options for spinal surgeons: state of the art 2021.Instr Course Lect. 2022; 71: 399-411
- Machine vision navigation in spine surgery.Front Surg. 2021; 8https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.640554
- Radiation dosage in orthopedics -- a comparison of computer-assisted procedures.Unfallchirurg. 2003; 106: 492-497
- Navigation at the spine.Injury. 2004; 35: 35-45
- Does Computer-Assisted Spine Surgery Reduce Intraoperative Radiation Doses?.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31: 2024-2027
- Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging.J Spinal Cord Med. 2008; 31: 532-537
- Intraoperative fluoroscopy, portable X-ray, and CT: patient and operating room personnel radiation exposure in spinal surgery.Spine J. 2014; 14: 2985-2991
- Occupational Exposure from Common Fluoroscopic Projections Used in Orthopaedic Surgery.J Bone Joint Surg. 2003; 85: 1698-1703
- Radiation exposure during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25: 1538-1541
- Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009; 22: 468-472
- Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery.Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007; 221: 813-820
- Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007; 20: 25-32
- Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.Eur Spine J. 2000; 9: 235-240
- Accuracy Analysis of Pedicle Screw Placement in Posterior Scoliosis Surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32: 1543-1550
- Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.J Neurosurg. 2003; 99: 257-263
- Efficacy of computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion for cervical instability in RA patients.Rheumatol Int. 2007; 27: 567-574
- Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement.J Neurosurg. 2010; 13: 606-611
- [Spinal navigation with intra-operative 3D-imaging modality in lumbar pedicle screw fixation].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008; 88: 1905-1908
- Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: E251-E258
- O-arm with navigation versus C-arm: a review of screw placement over 3 years at a major trauma center.Br J Neurosurg. 2016; 30: 658-661
- A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the o-arm imaging system and stealthstation navigation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37: E1580-E1587
- Accuracy and safety in pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spines : comparison study between conventional c-arm fluoroscopy and navigation coupled with o-arm® guided methods.J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012; 52: 204
- Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015; 28: E298-E303
- Pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography and 3-dimensional image-guided navigation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37: E188-E194
- Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25: 606-614
- Retrospective review of revision surgery after image-guided instrumented spinal surgery compared with traditional instrumented spinal surgery.Clin Spine Surg. 2020; 33: E317-E321
- Intraoperative Computed Tomography–Guided Navigation for Pediatric Spine Patients Reduced Return to Operating Room for Screw Malposition Compared With Freehand/Fluoroscopic Techniques.Spine Deformity. 2019; 7: 577-581
- Use of a quantitative pedicle screw accuracy system to assess new technology: Initial studies on O-arm navigation and its effect on the learning curve of percutaneous pedicle screw insertion.SAS J. 2011; 5: 57-62
- What should my hospital buy next?—Guidelines for the acquisition and application of imaging, navigation, and robotics for spine surgery.J Spine Surg. 2019; 5: 155-165
- Navigation and robotics in spinal surgery: where are we now?.Neurosurgery. 2017; 80: S86-S99
- Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in spinal stabilizations.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34: 2919-2926
- Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery.Surg Neurol Int. 2015; 6: S323-S326
- The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery.Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07
- Robotic-assisted spine surgery: history, efficacy, cost, and future trends.Robotic Surg Res Rev. 2019; 6: 9-23
- In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future.Neurosurgery. 2005; 56: 421-433
- Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients.Spine J. 2021; 21: 1504-1512
- Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J. 2021; 21: 181-192
- Accuracy of robot-assisted versus conventional freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Ann Translational Med. 2020; 8: 824
- What is the comparison in robot time per screw, radiation exposure, robot abandonment, screw accuracy, and clinical outcomes between percutaneous and open robot-assisted short lumbar fusion? a multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 310 patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022; 47: 42-48
- Spinal Robotics.Neurosurgery. 2013; 72: A12-A18
- Robotic-guidance allows for accurate S2AI screw placement without complications.J Robotic Surg. 2021; 0123456789: 2-7
- A multicenter study of the 5-year trends in robot-assisted spine surgery outcomes and complications.J Spine Surg. 2022; 8: 9-20
- Do robot-related complications influence 1 year reoperations and other clinical outcomes after robot-assisted lumbar arthrodesis? A multicenter assessment of 320 patients.J Orthopaedic Surg Res. 2021; 16https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02452-z
- Propensity-matched comparison of 90-day complications in robotic-assisted versus non-robotic assisted lumbar fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022; 47: 195-200
- Impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on health care quality and neurosurgical economics: A systemic review.Neurosurg Rev. 2020; 43: 17-25
- Introducing navigation or robotics into TLIF techniques: are we optimizing our index episode of care or just spending more money?.Spine J. 2019; 19: S61-S62
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of the integration of robotic spine technology in spine surgery.Neurospine. 2018; 15: 216-224
- Initial academic experience and learning curve with robotic spine instrumentation.Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 42: E4
- Learning curve for robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery.Asian Spine J. 2019; 13: 920-927
- Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: learning curve experience.World Neurosurg. 2019; 130: e417-e422
- What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?.Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1839-1844
- Spine surgery assisted by augmented reality: where have we been?.Yonsei Med J. 2022; 63: 305-316
- Augmented reality spine surgery navigation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022; 47: 865-872
- Implementation of augmented reality support in spine surgery.Eur Spine J. 2019; 28: 1697-1711
- Feasibility and accuracy of thoracolumbar minimally invasive pedicle screw placement with augmented reality navigation technology.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43: 1018-1023
- Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: a matched-control study comparing accuracy.Scientific Rep. 2020; 10: 1-8
- Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws.J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 36: 351-357
- Editorial. Navigation in spine surgery: an innovation here to stay.J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 36: 347-349
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
